photo 05873394-14be-4e3f-b9c7-36ad8e5cfcb0_zpsfytesxay.jpg
Politics

0

Former Bradford West MP George Galloway reacts to Syria airstrikes…

“Last night’s decision by Parliament to authorise British airstrikes in Syria, which are already taking place as you read this, will make nothing better, and may make things a whole lot worse. As a result, Syrian civilians will die, and the lives of British servicemen and women, and civilians, are put at serious risk.

“And for what? Let us be very clear, Cameron’s aim, his enemy, are not ISIS and Al Qaeda, but the regime of President Assad. This is evident in the fact that neither he, nor his allies in Paris and Washington, have lifted a finger nor spoken a word against the funding and arming of these and other extremist groups by NATO member Turkey, and our “closest ally in the Muslim world”, the tyranny that is Saudi Arabia.

It is also evident in Cameron’s fantastical claim of “70,000 moderate rebels” which will serve as a ground force, supposedly to liberate the areas we are now bombing. As countless experts have repeatedly pointed out, there are not 70,000, nor 7,000; it would be optimistic to claim there are 700 moderate rebels in Syria today.

“This latest attempt at regime change shows our political elite, including many Labour MPs, have learnt nothing from our recent wars on Libya and Iraq, the latter being the most direct and immediate cause of the fire now engulfing the whole region. These two interventions themselves were part of a wider history of over 100 years of British failure and bloodshed in the Middle East; occupying foreign lands, imposing and replacing borders and regimes, giving away Palestine to Zionist settlers. What could possibly be gained from yet another such abomination?

“I, along with millions of others, marched against the wars in Iraq and Libya. If the world had listened to us, instead of the siren calls of warmongers Blair, Cameron, Bush, Obama, Hollande, et al, there would be no ISIS, and Al Qaeda would not control a single square mile of land in the whole Middle East.

“We now march against this latest war, as we did outside Parliament last night, and the night before, and as we will continue to do over the coming days, weeks and months. Last night’s victory for warmongering in Parliament was not the beginning of the end, only the end of the beginning.”

With Respect,

George Galloway

by Mohammad Nazir Tabassum                                                                                                  

“As in Afghanistan, there is confusion about western objectives in a complex conflict – is the aim simply to push back Isis, or does it have to be halting the wider Syrian war in which Isis has thrived? Is this imaginable while President Assad remains on the stage, or is the removal of this man – who has killed more Syrians than anyone else, and driven so many to embrace Isis – a red line?” (The Guardian – Leader Comment 17/11/2015)

A member of the Islamic State in Syria and the Levant.This comment of the most esteemed daily newspaper of the UK is worth consideration. I think that while giving such comments, the learned editor has ignored certain basic and most important facts as to who initiated, instigated, supported, financed and funnelled the most sophisticated weaponry to the terrorists’ organisations like Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda, and the so-called Free Syrian Army, usually described by the western press as “moderate opposition of the Syrian government.” The terrorists from all over the Muslim world including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan and Chechnya were provided free access to come to Syria and join these terrorists. So all these three organisations acted as midwife and delivered the most barbaric, ruthless, heartless, merciless child that came to be known as Isis and who played havoc in Paris on 13 November 2015. Any impartial, unbiased and just observer can easily conclude that it is not President Assad but all these terrorist organisations supported and financed by the west as well as the monarchs, Amirs and Sultans of the Middle East, including Turkey, who drove many to embrace Isis. The western countries 226208-asadwatched passively while their Muslim citizens, both men and women, including Jihadi brides and in certain cases, the whole families to go and join the Isis.

There is sufficient evidence that the west has only been interested in the removal of Assad for which they have readily and happily been willing to pay the price of making their citizens unsafe at home. After all, why America wants to keep company with Al-Qaeda? For years they knew where Osama Bin Laden was housed, as did the Pakistan Army. They did not harm him. But only in 2011, when he was a spent up force and Barak Obama was going for his second term election that they chose to send the US Navy Seals to kill him. Bashar Al-Assad, like Qadafi and Saddam Hussain is secular.

pic_giant_091014_sm_obama-manages-isisIf the western countries really want their citizens to live in peace, then it is high time that they should reconsider their foreign policy. Interventionism pays dividends but only to a limited extent. It starts hurting very soon. The examples are Korea and China. Taiwan and South Korea have now fully realised that they were used as tools by the Americans.

When America and her western allies including the Middle East partners started a proxy campaign against Syrian President Al-Assad, they were faced by the Russians. Thus, they attempted, though unsuccessfully, to neutralize Russia. Look at the crude methodology that they applied to do so.

ujtCe9wjF89YaAPXGFmhhP0BvqwbAIh1Last month, a meeting took place between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Prince Bandar Bin Sultan, the chief of Saudi Intelligence and the key link between Washington and Riyadh. The encounter between the two was leaked by certain interested quarters. Thus, in return for Russian acquiescence to regime change in Syria, Bandar offered not only oil and gas deals, but a “guarantee” to protect the winter Olympics next year in Sochi, Russia from terrorist attacks by Chechen Islamists. Bandar assured Putin that these groups were “controlled by us” and could be instigated or restrained as it suited Saudi and US interests. The meeting took place at Mr Putin’s dacha outside Moscow.

This interesting episode was also reported by The Telegraph (Sunday 22 November 2015). This is something that indicates irrefutably that western countries’ foreign policy has serious drawbacks. A policy in which these governments along with their non-European allies can flock together any time and run over any peace-living country without caring much that by doing so they may be making their own homes and people unsafe. Newton’s third law of motion is applicable not only on physical but also on political phenomena. This law states that in nature to every action, there is always an equal and opposite reaction. Why the learned authors of western foreign policy deliberately ignore this scientific truth and start blaming others when they have to harvest the crop whose seeds were sown by them and by no one else.

In the final analysis I must state clearly and unambiguously that those who were brutally killed at various places in Paris were innocent people. They were not the scribblers of the French foreign policy. Their brutal killings cannot be justified by any reason whatsoever and the barbaric killers and the organisation to which they belong and wherever in the world they are located must be annihilated with the unified strength of all peace-loving, non-interfering countries of the world. The west and their Middle Eastern allies must realise that they have seen the removal of Qadafi and Saddam in the near past. Has anything good come out of that? Therefore, “desist from high-handedness because the vengeance of Nature is merciless.”

by Mohammed Ajeeb, CBE

“You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.” – Abraham Lincoln

narendramodipti-mThe Prime Minister of India, Narendra Damodardas Modi’s recent visit to Britain was marked by cheerful greetings, noisy and angry demonstrations, contempt, and some unfavourable and critical media reports. However, Mr David Cameron, our Prime Minister, received him on the rolling red carpet and showered him with factitious words of praise and admiration with the hope of securing more investment to the UK and vice versa. When Modi was received by a huge crowd of British Indians at Wembley Stadium, David Cameron accompanied him and acted as a compere and then greeted the crowd by speaking a few sentences in Hindi. He seized this opportunity to woo his potential voters as most of those present were wealthy businessmen and women.

On the other hand, Jeremy Corbyn the Labour leader, shunned Mr Modi and had a short private meeting with him. The reports suggest that Mr Corbyn, in this meeting, very cogently raised with Mr Modi the question of abuses of human rights in India. Mr Corbyn has been a consistent critic of Modi in the last few years.

modi-protestOn 12 November, a large demonstration was held against Modi in front of 10 Downing Street by mainly British Kashmiris as well as a number of Sikhs, Nepalese, Bhutanese and Sri Lankans. All these groups were protesting against Modi and his government’s intransigent and aggressive policies against their people. Under the Modi regime, the Kashmiris who have been struggling to achieve their fundamental right of self-determination for longer than half a century, claim to be suffering most grievously now from anti-Muslim overt policies of the present Indian government. The escalation of anti-Muslim sentiments in India, they believe their struggle for freedom will require more sacrifice of lives. Already more than eighty thousand men, woman and children are estimated to have been killed by the Indian security forces, numbering over three quarter of a million stationed there for the last 30 years.

modi-uk_0Mr Modi, who is well known as the butcher of Muslims during his reign as the chief minister of the Gujarat state in 2002, has recently been dubbed with the new title of ‘Hindu Taliban’ in an article written by Anish Kapoor in the Guardian. It is believed that Modi’s political shaping has greatly been influenced by his close association with the extreme militant Hindu organisations who have flourished in India since independence. Among the most bellicose of them are the Rashtriya Sawayam Sevak Sangh, Bajrang Dal and Bhartya Jan Sangh. Mahatma Gandhi, the symbol of none violence, peace and harmony was assassinated on 30 January 1948 by Nathuram Godsey, a militant Hindu and a prominent member of Mahasabha. Unfortunately, the resurgence of this mind-set is being supported and encouraged by the present government of BJP in India. Muslims and Christians are being forced into mass Hindu conversions and the suffocation of the freedom of expression, the raping of women and banning of consumption of beef are a few examples of Modi’s India. Some Muslims have been lynched and brutally murdered by fanatic Hindus because they were suspected of eating beef.

India, a so called secular country and the greatest democracy of the world, is fast becoming a land of intolerance, discrimination, violence and extremism where religious minorities have to live under oppression and the fear of losing their indentures and even their lives. Those who oppose these evil doings, are harassed and muzzled. The gravity of the current situation is noted by the world media too.

The history of India is imbued with a sense of grandeur, diversity, pathos, casteism, subjugation, polarisation, poverty and squalor. However, since its independence, most leaders of the country were sincere in developing India as a secular, modern and tolerant nation. Jawaharlal Nehru, on the sad occasion of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination, while addressing the nation said: ”Friends and comrades, the light has gone out of our lives and there is darkness everywhere.” Once again, the clouds of darkness are hovering over India’s horizon. The return of the mind set which took the life of Gandhi is at work again. India’s secularism and unity can be at risk if the necessary steps to nip into the bud of this evil are not taken now.

Meanwhile, BJP, the ruling party, has recently faced the electoral defeat in the eastern state of Bihar and many of the individuals and civil liberty groups are openly opposing Modi’s state sponsored oppressive measures. The women organisations have also come out to agitate against some of the obsolete attitudes of the extremists. Such moves should be welcomed and supported by all freedom loving people.

Boasting by Modi while in London, about the fast growing Indian economy and its influence in the region, does not stand any scrutiny. The preponderance of Indian masses are still struggling with the drudgery of their existence. The country’s relations with its neighbours are at their lowest ebb. Recent escalation of skirmishes on the border with Pakistan were feared to be turned into another war between the two neighbours. Kashmir still remains a flash point. Separatist movements in the country under Modi are gaining strength.

Despite the spending of millions of pounds by Modi’s friends in London, helped by David Cameron, they failed to achieve their goal. Modi could not win any laurels for himself because he could not fool all the British people. He was only able to fool himself.

Judith Cummins has this morning challenged the Government to do more to help families save money on their increasingly unaffordable energy bills, with an estimated 28,724 households classified as “fuel poor” in Bradford.

The Bradford South MP challenged Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Amber Rudd MP, saying:

“With the withdrawal of government funding for the Green Deal Finance Company, it is now even harder for over-stretched families to afford energy efficiency schemes in their homes. With poor quality housing stock too often leaving families in fuel poverty, what funding does she plan to introduce to help families save money on their increasingly unaffordable energy bills?”

Speaking outside the House of Commons chamber, Bradford South MP, Judith Cummins says: “With the cold winter weather beginning to bite, I wanted to challenge the government to recognise the sheer scale of fuel poverty in our communities and the impact withdrawing government funding for the Green Deal Finance Company. It’s made it even harder for over-stretched families to afford energy efficiency schemes in their homes.

“It’s outrageous that nearly 30,000 families in Bradford are struggling to cope with their energy costs. The Government can and must do more to help people reduce their energy bills.

“The Government’s proposed cuts to Tax Credits could tip thousands of working families in Bradford over the edge, as they are already struggling to make ends meet.  This could result in even higher levels of fuel poverty in the future”.

 New research has been released yesterday by national charity Turn2us found that one in two low income households are struggling to afford their energy costs, despite being in work.

Worryingly, of those households who are struggling with energy costs, nearly half (48%) have done so for more than a year. The knock-on effect is severe, with a third (33%) forced to skip meals and over a fifth (21%) experiencing stress and other mental health problems.

Questioning Ministers in the House of Commons, Bradford East’s MP, Imran Hussain called on the Government to do more to tackle the health inequalities blighting the poorer areas of Bradford.

These inequalities in health remains a particular concern for Bradford as according to a report conducted by Public Health England in June 2015, life expectancy in the most deprived areas of the city is 9.6 years lower for men and 8 years lower for women when compared against the least deprived areas, highlighting the severe disparities in healthcare that exist.

The link between deprivation and poor healthcare is also highlighted by national figures from the Office of National Statistics which show that in England, men and women living in the most deprived areas, are up to four times more likely to have a ‘not good’ health rating than their equivalent in the least deprived areas.

Citing these damning figures by Public Health England, Mr Hussain also claimed that “the Government’s attacks on the poor makes this issue worse” as cuts to household incomes and children’s services lead to food poverty and poor nutrition which has been shown to be a leading cause of healthcare problems.

Speaking on health inequalities in Bradford, Imran Hussain, MP for Bradford East said:

“Health inequality between the richest and the poorest in Bradford is a huge problem for the city and the fact that it is so great is deeply concerning as it means that the quality of life and even the life expectancy of those in the most deprived areas is negatively affected simply because of their background and income.

“Not only does this inequality result in poorer life expectancy, it also leads to greater costs for the NHS who have to address the issues that are caused by it, along with a restriction of people’s life chances and their ability work their way out of poverty as numerous studies show health is closely linked to educational attainment.

“Therefore greater action is needed to tackle health inequalities in Bradford and the Government has to seriously invest in NHS services focused on improving health in the poorest people, and stop their widespread cuts to tax credits and Sure Start which are leaving growing numbers of parents unable to provide a consistent and healthy diet and lifestyle for their children, which further exacerbates the situation.”

The Prime Minister, David Cameron has made it clear that at the end of this term in Downing Street, he will step down. Nonetheless, as pledged in 2013, he is bound to hold an in-out from the EU referendum before the end of 2017.

flagJudged by some of his not-easy-to-understand assertions, he is leaving the country in the lurch. When he says: “English votes for English laws”, it connotes that he is saying goodbye to the Scots before they actually opt for independence. Thus, there is a state of uncertainty – uncertainty about the future constitutional relationship between the different components of the United Kingdom: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Though SNP were humbled following the “No” vote in the Scottish independence referendum yet it left the sovereignty of Westminster internally within the UK in question.

Mr Cameron, irrespective of achieving anything substantial in renegotiation with the leaders of the EU, has to go for referendum. It will turn out later whether he will campaign to remain in or to get out of the EU. Either way his campaign would hinge upon 4 things – preferences of the people on EU membership, the question asked in the referendum, Conservatives’ popularity and inter- and intra-party politics.

cameron-euro-5_2079690bAccording to the latest opinion polls 40% of the people want to leave the EU. Receiving 4 million votes, 13% of those cast, UKip, who won the last EU elections, are campaigning for Britain’s exit from the EU. A substantial number of Tory MPs and many MPs of the Labour party are also in favour of exit.

In referendums, the question asked is always of crucial importance. In 2013, Conservatives suggested: “Do you think the UK should remain a member of European Union, Yes or No”. This question was widely criticised by various circles. Thus, the Electoral Commission intervened and proposed: “Should UK remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?” This question was accepted by the Prime Minister Mr Cameron.

Though the Tories won 2015 general elections to the extent of forming government comfortably without sharing power with any other party, yet they are not comfortable over the in-out question. David Cameron wants to stay in the EU once he got some powers back from it. At the moment, Cameron is reluctant to reveal the full details of what he wants from the EU leaders but he is expected to demand opt-out from the EU ambition to forge a United States of Europe. His other demands may include restriction of access to in-work and out-of-work benefits to EU migrants, greater powers to national parliaments to block EU legislation, freeing of businesses from red tape and excessive interference from Brussels, protection of City of London financial markets from EU legislation and lastly, creating safeguards to ensure changes in the single market that should not be imposed on non-euro zone members by the euro zone.

Here I must stop to stress over another aspect of the issue, and that is, referendums quite often turn out to be the popularity tests of the incumbent government. Just like mid-term polls, these provide an opportunity to the public to express their indignation with the performance of the government. Here I would like to quote Michelle Dorrell, 35, a mum of 4, and a Tory voter, who broke down in tears on Question Time (15/10/15). Full of tears she confronted the energy secretary Amber Rudd saying: “I thought you were going to be better for me and my children.” As she said this the audience members shouted: “Shame on you.” So things like these cannot be ignored and these will make the legacy David Cameron would be leaving for his successor.

Then there is a tug of war within and without the Conservatives. There is no denying the fact that when a party is split internally, it cannot successfully persuade voters of their leadership’s message. There are quite a few Tory MPs who would cause internal division. On the contrary, it seems more likely that internal divisions within the Labour party will make a ‘Brexit’ (Britain’s exit from EU) more plausible. Though both the Lib Dems and the Labour opposed referendum during the general elections saying that no referendum unless there were plans to transfer more powers from the UK to the EU but later on Labour stopped opposing referendum.

The Labour party, SNP, Plaid Cymru and the Lib Dems are in favour of staying in the EU. They believe that Britain gets a big boost from EU membership – it makes selling things easier. They argue that the flow of immigrants, most of whom are young and keen to work, enhance the economic growth and helps pay for public services. They also believe that Britain’s status in the world would be damaged by leaving EU.

David Cameron has said that there is “no doubt” his planned reforms will require changes to the treaties governing the EU. But this would require the unanimous support of all EU members, and it may not be possible within the deadline he has set for a referendum before the end of 2017.

However, Jean-Claude Junker, President of the European Commission, has said he is ready to work with Mr Cameron to “strike a fair deal for the UK in the EU.” “The ball is very much in the court of the UK now”, a senior official told the Guardian. “It’s up to the British to define what they want.”

by Naz Shah
by Naz Shah, MP

It has been almost six months since the people of Bradford West placed their trust in me and voted for me. What a journey I’ve been on since!

On a personal level, it has been a bit of a roller coaster and people in Westminster weren’t kidding when they said the first 6 weeks will be just induction and settling, including setting up two new offices and recruiting staff.

Locally, I am pleased to report that we now a have a full team of staff who are working hard on behalf of the residents of Bradford West. On average, the local office are dealing with more than 125 constituent queries on a weekly basis.

IMG_0194In terms of my own parliamentary work, I am pleased with my most recent appointment to the Home Affairs Select Committee.

Very early on following my election, I had my first experience of something very international yet very local. Nothing could have prepared me for grappling with the idea of any local women taking their children to Syria and the media interest that followed suit. It is still something that troubles me and I can imagine it will be something I will never be able to reconcile.

My interest in this issue of radicalisation, extremism, Islamaphobia and policing, influenced my decision to put myself forward for the role which I am enjoying immensely, as it is challenging me and my own learnings whilst I also have the chance to hold the government to account on issues, particularly around extremism, which is one of the bigger issues we are grappling with as a country including the rise of Deash.

image3I also had the honour of being a member of the Welfare Bill Committee which gave me an opportunity to raise the voice of my constituents around the unacceptable changes, particularly the welfare cap and tax credits that this government wants to bring in. The cuts proposed will hit those in need the most and tax credits are a hand up, not a hand out!

Some of the other areas of work I am now also involved with are around human rights issues. Only this morning, I have agreed to support the work of an international charity around the legality of the use of drones. I also continue to contribute regularly to discussions around humanitarian issues within Palestine and Kashmir and am I committed to keeping that dialogue going and raising awareness.

image1As a feminist with a keen interest around the issues of violence against women, I will be supporting discussions and facilitating meetings in relation to women in India and Pakistan as well as here in the UK.

Some of the groups I will be working with include Muslim Women’s Network UK, Southall Black Sisters, Women of the World and the Cortson Review.

Around local issues, I have been meeting regularly in Bradford with all those involved in key issues. For example, I have met with the Leader of the Council no less than six times on issues including education, development, the Syrian refugee crisis and employment/business development. Obviously, we still have more work to do in these areas and I am keen to see rapid improvement.

I have met the head of the LEP and we are exploring development opportunities in the city going forward, especially with the new Westfield shopping complex now open.

I have developed good working relationships with the police and the West Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner and I am regularly updated on issues pertinent to Bradford West.

image1I am also in regular dialogue with our other local service providers and have meetings scheduled with the hospitals trust and higher educational institutes so we can work together for the betterment of our communities. The police, hospitals, schools, university and colleges are all key service providers that are under increasing pressure, and it’s imperative that we try to continue to be innovative and support front line staff, whilst striving to provide the best possible services in Bradford.

Work aside, it’s been an interesting few months. Unfortunately I didn’t get to enjoy the summer recess due to illness and a spell in hospital. I had lots planned which could not happen, in particular, catching up with people locally.

Although it’s only been 6 months, it feels much longer especially when my youngest child is now stringing together long sentences and having proper conversations. I also now have my daughter in secondary school. It’s also been a huge honour to win a national award for overcoming adversity and making it on to the ‘Most Influential British Asians Power List’ in such a short time into my job made it all the more humbling.

Now with the leadership contest over, I’m looking forward to the next six months and I am confident of making further progress and building upon the work I am already doing.

Should people need any support on issues, please do get in touch. We have three weekly surgeries and our contact details are:

West Riding House, 41 Cheapside, Bradford, BD1 4HR, Tel 01274 725171, or email me Naz.shah.mp@parliament.uk. You can also follow me on Twitter for further updates @nazshahbfd

Latest – Bradford West Member of Parliament, Naz Shah, has been selected to sit on the Home Affairs Select Committee.

Naz Shah
Naz Shah

Ms Shah, who defeated George Galloway earlier this year, is proving to be a popular figure within the Labour Party and is working tirelessly to improve Bradford West and the city as a whole.

Speaking to Urban Echo, Ms Shah states: “It is with great privilege that I announce my unopposed selection to the very important Home Affairs Select Committee.”

Ms Shah’s current areas of work include:

– The investigation into the late Lord Brittan

– Reform of the Police funding formula

– Countering extremism

– Migration crisis

– Immigration: skill shortages

– The work of the Home Secretary

– The work of the Home Office

– Psychoactive substances

Ms Shah concludes, “I endeavour to play my part and hold this government to account”.

 

Jeremy Corbyn, the newly elected leader of the Labour Party is being jeered at from outside and within his own party since September 12. Those who elected him with an outstanding edge over his three rivals, have pinned certain hopes on him. One out of many is the most important; they don’t want to see their leader failing, neither at the party nor at national level. So he must also have the clear realisation not to disappoint them on this count.

jeremy-corbyn-labour-leadership-electionWe do respect his republicanism but when it comes to his voters, many of whom still revere monarchy, and he standing respectfully in silence while the national anthem was being sung in remembrance of the Battle of Britain, and not moving his lips with others, is nothing but to disappoint his voters and give a chance of mudslinging to his adversaries. Right at the time of announcement of the result of leadership, he should have assumed himself a leader of the Labour Party who represents everyone, speaks for everyone and is no more an individual and idealist backbencher.

However, soon after his election as Leader of the Labour Party, he did certain good things as well. His clear cut articulation “working together to achieve great victories, not just electorally for Labour, but emotionally for the whole of our society to show that we don’t have to be unequal. It doesn’t have to be unfair, poverty isn’t inevitable, things can, and they will, change” has been very well received. The announcement of a 31 member shadow cabinet with the majority of women and a novel way adopted during the PMQs, were certainly appreciated. Even in this case he was castigated that the top three departments were all male. In an effort to bring about a balance in this regard, he elevated Angela Eagle to the post of first secretary of state that has always been so far a male monopoly. His broadly based shadow cabinet consisting of Lord Falconer, Hilary Benn, Rosie Winterton and Andy Burnham, apart from others indicated continuity.

The other good thing that he did was to accept the membership of the Privy Council. It is customary that Leader of the Opposition is taken into confidence and revealed to him certain highly confidential matters relating the national security policy. It has been leaked out that the leadership of the armed forces is reluctant to share with him such things but the Conservatives would certainly like to put his sense of responsibility to test.

gettyimages-481043092There are quite a number of Labour MPs, who do not support his stance over the use of drone attacks over ISIS in Syria, EU, NATO and Trident. So far as the EU is concerned, Corbyn has committed publicly that the party would campaign for the UK to stay in the EU in the forthcoming referendum. However he said: “We will, of course, oppose any attempt by the Tory government to undermine workers’ rights. But Labour is clear that the answer to any damaging changes that David Cameron brings back from his negotiation, is not to leave the European Union but to pledge to reverse any changes by campaigning to stay in and get a Labour government elected in 2020.”

On NATO and Trident, the first rebuke of Jeremy Corbyn came from military four days after his election. The first sea lord, Admiral Sir George Zambellas announced the renewal of Trident and the creation of a new aircraft carrier fleet. He said: “I believe these two capabilities will define our nation’s strategic and maritime security authority for the next half a century or more.”

This can be well understood in the backdrop of Corbyn’s opposition of the renewal of Trident and spending of 2% of GDP on defence. Though Zambellas’s remark was certainly not aimed at Corbyn and hardly any senior member of the military would challenge an elected politician in public. Yet the senior ranks of military do think about these matters privately. The Sunday Times quoted a senior serving general who said: “there would be mass resignations at all levels and you would face the very real prospect of an event which would effectively be mutiny” in the event of Corbyn becoming prime minister. It is sufficient to refresh our memories of the alleged military plots to destabilise Harold Wilson. These are the basis of Tory ministers harping on the tune that the Labour party is “a threat to our national security, our economic security and our family’s security.” Yet, the Tories altogether ignore Europe’s refugee crisis, contribute to the collapse of the NHS and now they are concentrating on trade union bill to crush already feeble employee rights, amassing more wealth by drained profits from wages.

The choices are open to Jeremy Corbyn: accept the challenges, eschew individualism and work to keep the party united under his wings. Only by this way he would be able to cast away the shadows of the coming events.

There has been a lot of mudslinging against Jeremy Corbyn’s gaining more and more popularity in his campaign for Labour leadership orchestrated by the hierarchy of Labour party as well as the Tories and the press.

jeremy-corbyn-labour-leadership-electionNonetheless, every turn of the tide bailed him out against all odds and people like Rupert Murdoch, the News Corporation boss, who equally backed Tony Blair and David Cameron win general elections, had to acknowledge in his Twitter fed on 20/08/15: “Corbyn increasingly likely Labor winner. Seems only candidate who believes anything, right or wrong.”

Addressing a packed hall of over 1,000 people in Newcastle on 19/08/15 Corbyn condemned austerity and shared his views on Murdoch: “When the party says it has to be seen economically competent to be attractive that can mean lots of things. You can make yourself very attractive to Rupert Murdoch. You can make yourself very attractive to global corporations. You can make yourself very attractive to the super rich around the world. But the problem is you make yourself attractive at the expense of something else – often called soul – but also the very poorest within our society”.

imagesOn 21/08/15 Corbyn said in a statement to the Guardian: “I’d apologise to the British people for the ‘deception’ in the run-up to the 2003 invasion and to the Iraqi people for their subsequent suffering”. He also vowed that future UK military inventions would be rarer: “Let us say we will never again unnecessarily put out troops under fire and our country’s standing in the world at risk. Let us make it clear that Labour will never make the same mistake again, will never flout the United Nations and international law.”

Jeremy Corbyn’s planned apology is intended to win back those who left the party or stayed but felt estranged as a result of the decision to go to war. He said, ”Labour, to win in 2020, needed to rebuild its coalition with those who opposed the conflict”. This apology would also be an attempt to pre-empt the findings of Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war: “The endless delay on the Chilcot inquiry is wrong. But we don’t have to wait for Chilcot to know that the mistakes were made and we need to make amends”.

If Corbyn wins the September 12 Leadership election, little doubt now left, there is going to be a great shift in Labour’s foreign and security policies. He has expressed scepticism about the role of NATO, in particular its eastwards expansion and the standoff with Russia. Moreover, there would be little likelihood to support the proposed renewal of Trident, the nuclear weapons programme.

So far as the statistics are concerned, there has been a continuous upsurge in Labour party membership since May which now stands at 600,000. When Tony Blair became Leader, he vowed to raise the membership to one million but never went beyond 400,000. According to the latest polls, Corbyn scores 53% on first preferences that means 32% ahead of his closest rival. Similarly he wins 32% public support who says that it would be more likely that they support Labour under Corbyn. Even on this count he has an edge of 7% over his rivals.

Now, let’s look at the issue from another aspect. There are three important characteristics of Jeremy Corbyn none of which are found in any one of his rivals. Firstly, he is one of the best three political communicators of the UK, the other two being Alex Salmond of SNP and Nigel Farage of UKip. Secondly, his rivals in the leadership contest are very week and quite bore. Thirdly, there is a message in the claims made by Corbyn about a collective society and cooperation to be delivered that would certainly resonate across the UK in the next parliament.

There would certainly be some problems as well. These may be within the domain of foreign policy and defence. Yet it can be expected that the attitudes would be far less self-defeating. Similarly mass immigration, inequality and climate change which are linked together intricately could be the other challenges. But if the Islington North MP, after becoming Labour party leader, did anything really good on these counts, he would then prove himself the best party leader in the UK.

The last and final is the letter made public by 41 economists who have defended Corbyn’s economic policies. This is the letter in which David Blanchflower, a former member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee is one of the 41 signatories, the economists write: “The accusation is widely made that Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters have moved to the extreme left on economic policy. But this is not supported by the candidate’s statements or policies. His opposition to austerity is actually mainstream economics, even backed by the conservative IMF. He aims to boost growth and prosperity.”

By Nazir Tabassum

VIDEO'S